Institutes
Incompatibility of Office
The Commission for the Prevention of Corruption (the Commission) may assess and establish the incompatibility of office only for officials not subject to provisions regarding the incompatibility of office contained in any other law, and for officials subject to a law referring to the use of the provisions of another law, one of which is the Integrity and Prevention of Corruption Act (IPCA).
Professional Officials
The incompatibility of office and activities for professional officials is governed by Article 26 as “incompatibility of office and exceptions” and in Paragraph 1 of Article 27 as “prohibition of membership and activities”.
The IPCA prohibits professional officials from performing a professional or other activity aimed at generating income or proceeds. It also stipulates exceptions to the said prohibition by legally sanctioning the permission to engage in pedagogical, scientific, research, artistic, cultural, sports and publishing activities, manage a farm, and manage one’s own assets. An official may engage in these activities (with the exception of sports and publishing activities, managing a farm, and managing their own assets) upon obtaining the permission from their employer in accordance with the applicable law. It is also the duty of the official to notify the Commission in writing within eight working days of the commencement of the activity and enclose the employer’s permission and the contract as concluded for the performance of the activity of profession.
Within 15 days of the receiving of the notification, the Commission may initiate the procedure for assessing the incompatibility of office with a specific activity. In case of the probability that the scope and nature of the activity in question in regard to the office held by the professional official could represent a disproportionate risk to the objective and impartial performance of the said office or jeopardise its integrity, the Commission may prohibit the performance of the additional activity.
In exceptional cases, the Commission may issue a permission to a professional official to engage in an otherwise prohibited gainful activity upon the official’s request. In deciding, the Commission takes into account the public interest and the degree of risk the performance of the activity would pose to the objective and impartial discharge of the duties of the office or jeopardise its integrity. The Commission may and must not issue such a permission if precluded by another law or if the professional official seeks to obtain income from the body in which they hold the office.
The IPCA further stipulates that a professional official may not hold membership or engage in activities of management, supervision, or representation of companies, economic interest groupings, co-operatives, public institutes, funds, agencies, or other entities governed by public or private law, except in societies, foundations, and political parties.
Non-professional Officials
While an absolute prohibition of membership and activities in cases outlined above is in effect for professional officials, in the case of non-professional officials, the prohibition is in effect only for the entities (companies, institutes, co-operatives, etc.) in which the non-professional official exercises direct supervision as a duty of their office.
Non-professional Mayors and Deputy Mayors
Non-professional mayors and deputy mayors are subject to an essentially identical prohibition as professional officials, namely that non-professional mayors and deputy mayors may not hold membership or engage in activities of management, supervision, or representation of public institutes, funds, agencies, and other entities governed by public or private law inasmuch the entity governed by private law is vested with public authority or is a public-service provider. This limitation or rather prohibition is imposed from 23rd April 2011, date of entry of IPCA-A into force, but only in cases when a non-professional mayor or deputy mayor discharges the duties of their office in a municipality related to said entities in terms of founding, ownership, supervision, or finance.
Minor offences
An individual shall be fined from €400 to €1,200 for the minor offence of failing to inform the Commission that they are carrying out a professional or other activity in contravention of the provision of paragraph two of Article 26 of the IPCA.
An individual shall be fined from €400 to €1,200 for the minor offence of failing to comply with the Commission’s decision on the prohibition of the performance of an additional activity or with the conditions or restrictions imposed on them by the Commission’s decision in contravention of the provision of Paragraph 3 of Article 26 of the IPCA.
An individual shall be fined from €1,000 to €2,000 for the minor offence of failing to cease to perform a professional or other activity in contravention of the provision of Paragraph 5 of Article 26 of the IPCA after the decision made on revocation of permission has become final.